I liked this column by Jay Rayner in the Guardian, on what an exasperatingly circumscribing retort is "first-world problems", with the standfirst:
"It is possible to disapprove of machine-cut jamon and to feel outrage over Syria at the same time."
I often find the FWP retort quite amusing, but that doesn't mean I think it should be used to shut down consideration of anything other than disease, murder and starvation.
Here's Saul Bellow saying something similar in his novel More Die of Heartbreak:
"The sufferings of freedom also had to be considered. Otherwise we would be conceding a higher standard to totalitarianism, saying that only oppression could keep us honest."